Source: Earth Sciences New Zealand
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/climate-news-a-dry-start-to-autumn-for-much-of-new-zealand/
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/climate-news-a-dry-start-to-autumn-for-much-of-new-zealand/
Source: Radio New Zealand
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has welcomed news of a ceasefire between the US, Israel and Iran – but is warning New Zealanders of ongoing economic effects.
Speaking to reporters after the Reserve Bank on Wednesday confirmed a decision to keep the official cash rate steady, Luxon said the news of a ceasefire was “a really promising and really encouraging move, I mean it’s the most encouraging news I think we’ve had in this conflict, absolutely”.
But he repeatedly warned against people getting too comfortable, and said the best case scenario for fuel prices coming down was probably “a matter of weeks”.
“This as a complex conflict, it’s been unpredictable, it’s been volatile, and we’re going to do everything we can to actually exhort the parties to actually use the two weeks to get to what we need to see which is an enduring solution here.”
It was “too early to comment” on the specifics of the ceasefire, he said, and while it could see a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to shipping – including fuel tankers – the economic impacts were likely to continue for some time.
“It was running at 125 [ships through the Strait] a day, we’ve been running about four a day… but I just want to be really honest there’s a long way to go here.
“There’s no escaping the fact there will be a hit to inflation and economic growth, and that means real impacts for Kiwis beyond the price of petrol. As we’ve repeatedly said, New Zealand has learned the lessons from Covid the hard way and we will not repeat the mistakes made at that time.”
He said the government’s domestic focus remained on the risks to inflation and growth in the economy, which meant securing fuel to protect jobs, livelihoods and the wider economy.
Fuel suppliers had not reported any issues with future orders or shipments, and New Zealand remained at phase 1 of the fuel response plan, he said.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis said markets had reacted positively to the ceasefire news, with crude oil prices falling and global equities up.
“As of 1pm – by one measure, West Texas, crude oil is down around 16 percent – and Brent crude down 12.5 percent to $USD95 a barrel.
“SMP futures are also up and the New Zealand stock exchange is up, gaining 1.7 percent. The New Zealand dollar has also appreciated against the Greenback (USD).”
Finance Minister Nicola Willis said markets had reacted positively to the ceasefire news. RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
She said despite the ceasefire development, it remained unclear how fast cargo would begin to move through the Strait of Hormuz should the ceasefire hold.
“Oil and gas facilities have also been damaged or shut down across the region and these will take time to bring back online. New Zealand is also a long way from our fuel suppliers, but prices here typically respond quickly to oil market moves – usually within a week or so but this may take longer in this instance given the heightened volatility in markets and residual uncertainty about the geopolitical situation.”
She noted the price of oil was not the same as that of refined fuels, and refineries had an extended disruption to crude supplies – so it could take extra time to flow through to lower prices for petrol and diesel.
Luxon said questions about potential tolling of the Strait were “way too premature”.
He said Trump’s earlier comments that a civilisation could die were “incredibly unhelpful” and “unprecedented for a US president period”.
“But I don’t think reiterating that rhetoric is helpful either, but equally we’ve got to deal with what we’re dealing with now, and what we’re dealing with now is an opportunity and the question is whether the parties will actually step up to the plate and realise it.”
Pressed on the matter, he refused to use stronger language than that Trump’s comments were “unhelpful”.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/04/08/luxon-willis-caution-economic-effects-will-continue-despite-ceasefire/
Source: Radio New Zealand
New Zealand Defence Force set up Operation Respect in 2016. NZDF / Supplied
Release of the latest audit of the Defence Force’s decade-old attempts to reduce abusive behaviours has been pushed back.
The NZDF set up Operation Respect in 2016 but a “code of silence” was still getting in the way in 2020.
In 2024, the Office of the Auditor General said uncertainty over resourcing it was creating risks.
His next review – the third into the operation’s performance – had been due early this year but is now set for release in late June.
Its focus was on leadership and whether that was building trust, said the OAG.
“It will provide our views about whether NZDF senior leaders are committed and accountable for Operation Respect’s success and building a safe and effective response system.”
In 2024, the OAG audit of the strategy behind Respect said it was “on the right path to succeed” after more investment and prioritisation, and work on improving complaints procedures, following 2023’s second performance audit.
Defence told MPs recently it had refocused the operation to progressively eliminate harmful sexual behaviour, alcohol and drug abuse, and bullying and discrimination.
It cut some jobs set up under it amid wider restructuring last year but says this made services more professional.
It told a select committee that funding had been “optimised to get the best out of the programme”.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/04/08/audit-of-defence-forces-attempts-to-reduce-abusive-behaviours-delayed/
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Deane, Professor of Trade Law and Taxation, Queensland University of Technology
From July 31, the United States will impose up to 100% tariffs on pharmaceuticals coming into the US. Some Australian-made exports look set to pay that highest rate, while some other countries – including the UK, Japan and the European Union – have negotiated lower rates.
The new US tariffs are not specific to Australian-made products. However, the US pharmaceutical industry has long called for tougher tariffs on Australia because of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), a subsidised scheme that supports cheaper medicines for Australians.
Following the announcement of the new tariffs, Health Minister Mark Butler said Australia’s position hasn’t changed, promising:
this will not impact drug prices for Australian consumers […] There will be no negotiation around the PBS under an Albanese government.
What could these new tariffs mean for affordable medicine in Australia? And is there anything Australia could offer to get a better deal?
US President Donald Trump first threatened to bring in pharmaceutical tariffs of up to 200% last year.
These sector-specific tariffs are separate from last year’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, which have been ruled unlawful by the US Supreme Court.
The pharmaceutical tariffs have been introduced under section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act, used for other products such as steel and aluminium. These tariffs are legal and can apply indefinitely.
Starting from July 31, the US will:
Broadly speaking, essential and generic medicines will pay zero tariffs.
Companies can receive a discounted 20% tariff for four years if they offer the US competitive pricing and commit to manufacturing in the US.
Products from trading partners Japan, the EU, South Korea, Switzerland and Liechtenstein will be charged a 15% tariff.
The UK has struck what might appear to be the best deal for zero-tariff access for UK-made medicines to the US for three years. But the UK got that deal by agreeing to pay more for medicines – which some warn could cost the UK’s National Health System more than it saves.
The US is Australia’s biggest pharmaceutical export market, worth around A$2.1 billion in 2024.
Most of those exports (87%) are blood plasma products, an essential medicine that’s exempt from the incoming tariffs, mainly from manufacturing giant CSL.
CSL has said it expects most of its products to be exempt from the 100% tariff. Smaller medicines maker Mesoblast manufactures in the US, so is also exempt.
That leaves only a fraction of smaller Australian pharmaceutical makers set to pay the 100% tariff.
The federal government has promised to try for a better deal. So what concessions might the US ask for?
The US pharmaceutical industry has long pushed for changes to Australia’s PBS, which forces them to negotiate on prices with just one buyer: the Australian government. The industry says the scheme “undermines American competitiveness, jobs and exports”.
But the scheme makes a big difference for Australians needing affordable medicines. No matter the cost of the medicine, under the PBS Australians pay a maximum of A$25 per script (or $7.70 for concession card holders).
In 2023, an average of 13 PBS-funded prescriptions were dispensed per person over the year.
On average, that government funding saved individuals around $641 per person for the year. For people living in lower socioeconomic areas, that personal saving was even greater: $714 per person.
Read more: Australia’s PBS means consumers pay less for expensive medicines. Here’s how this system works
Assuming the Albanese government sticks to its position – keeping the PBS out of negotiations over the pharmaceutical tariffs – medicine prices in Australia should not change after July 31.
In fact, the maximum cost of PBS-listed medicines has actually fallen since the start of 2026.
Instead, the US tariffs are likely to raise the cost of medicines for Americans. Looking at who had paid the price of previous Trump tariffs on imports into the US, Federal Reserve Bank of New York economists recently found “nearly 90% of the tariffs’ economic burden fell on US firms and consumers”.
Until now, Australia has done better than many countries with Trump’s tariffs.
It may seem tempting to match the UK’s zero-tariff deal. But on balance, protecting affordable medicines for Australians is worth far more than a deal for a small number of exporters.
However, there could be one avenue for offering to work on the PBS, which could also offer a win for Australians in getting faster access to new medicines.
National industry body Medicines Australia has urged the federal government to streamline how soon drugs that are officially approved are made available under the PBS. In 2016-2021, Medicines Australia says that time blew out to 466 days.
A 2024 government review backed the need to speed up the PBS listing process.
The speed of Australian medicine approvals is only one of the US industry’s complaints about the PBS, so it’s not a major bargaining chip.
But it could be worth offering as a win for US companies exporting to Australia, all while keeping bigger changes to the PBS firmly off the negotiating table.
– ref. Why Australia is right to put affordable medicine ahead of beating US pharmaceutical tariffs – https://theconversation.com/why-australia-is-right-to-put-affordable-medicine-ahead-of-beating-us-pharmaceutical-tariffs-280026
Evening Report: https://eveningreport.nz/2026/04/08/why-australia-is-right-to-put-affordable-medicine-ahead-of-beating-us-pharmaceutical-tariffs-280026/
Source: Radio New Zealand
Football Fern Kelli Brown wants to keep scoring international goals. Photosport
Aspiring bike mechanic, surfer and prolific goalscorer Football Fern Kelli Brown can’t wait for a Hamilton homecoming on Sunday during the Fifa World Cup Oceania Qualifiers semi-final.
The Football Ferns play Fiji in their semi-final with the winner progressing to Wednesday’s final in Auckland with a place at next year’s World Cup on the line.
Brown arrived back in camp with the national team days after her A-League season with Newcastle Jets ended in disappointment, with the side missing the finals leaving her with “no idea” about what happens next.
The 25-year-old striker from Hamilton, who started her A-League career with the Wellington Phoenix before a stint with Perth Glory, is now out of contract with the Jets.
She is open to another season in Newcastle and is equally open to going “back to the drawing board” to determine her next move.
“Club football for me is just something that keeps me going,” Brown said.
“I’m always grateful for what I can do and the improvements that I can make, but allowing me to be in a space that can put me in a good position to play internationally is probably higher on my priorities.
“I don’t have any super high expectations of this is where I want to be. I’m just kind of riding the wave. The opportunity is so fun. You can do anything, you can go anywhere and I think that’s really exciting.”
Newcastle Jets Kelli Brown during the A-League Women. Marty Melville/ Photosport
Club football in Newcastle fit around Brown’s day job at a bike shop as “a bit of a bike builder, wannabe mechanic type of thing”.
Giving her time to also ride her road bike and go surfing.
“It’s important that you do have life outside of football because football is a hell of a rollercoaster sometimes.
“So being able to switch off in a sense of giving yourself some time to just chill and just exist and do something else is important.
“Not have to think about [football] if you can, which sometimes is impossible, I’m not going to lie.”
A push to get the A-League women’s competition to move to full-time has been gathering momentum over the last few seasons.
Brown said going full-time would provide stability for players and “a bit more of a professional set-up compared to what it is now”.
“But reality of that being possible in the next short space of time is probably not very high. There’s obviously a few things that need to be scrubbed up on before that can go full-time.
“I think working on just solidifying the new [collective bargaining agreement] is important. To just see what next season looks like first is probably a higher priority.”
New Zealand’s Kelli Brown, right, celebrates with Rebekah Stott scoring a goal during Fifa Women’s World Cup Qualifiers. Joshua Devenie / Phototek.nz
While her club future is up in the air, Brown knows what she wants to achieve with the Football Ferns during the World Cup qualifiers finals.
The last time Brown was the Football Ferns she scored her first international goals.
A first half hat-trick in a World Cup qualifier against Samoa in February was a spectacular way to get off the mark.
“It was awesome, eh? As a striker, I always want to have a crack at scoring, so to be able to do that for my country was pretty unreal.
“After scoring one goal, that was kind of crazy, and I was kind of content.
“A hat-trick was super crazy and not part of the plan, but super grateful to have the opportunity to go out there and score some goals for sure.”
Brown ended the first part of the qualifiers with four goals and wants to add to her growing tally, especially in front of a home crowd.
“To score some more goals would be sick, in front of our home crowd, even cooler.
“If I can get on the field that would be outrageous, and then I just want to score goals.
“My mum and dad in the stand, that’ll be cool. We’ll have to do some really cool celebrations.”
The transition between club and country is not always seamless for Brown who has 11 caps for New Zealand.
“Just remembering kind of small things of I’m playing in this style with these rules rather than that style with those rules. I think I sometimes struggle to lock in on, like, wait, this is completely different.
“I think it’s just a different style, but a good one.”
A break between the qualifiers held in the Solomon Islands and the semi-finals and potential final was “tactically probably a good thing” for the Football Ferns.
With a club a change in playing style can develop over a season, with the national team camps can be over in 10 days limiting the amount of time there is to implement change or progress.
Brown likes to break down film with her New Zealand team mates and have face-to-face chats at the breakfast table to make sure they are on the right track with the global tournament in Brazil looming.
“Sometimes I find watching the game myself, I’m concentrating too much on just what I’m doing and not how the team can benefit.
“But when you’ve got seven other people watching seven other people, there’s a lot more of, ‘well, if you did that and I did that, then we could’ … I think review is pretty important to know where you’re going and what you’re doing compared to how it felt in the moment.”
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/04/08/to-score-some-more-goals-would-be-sick-for-football-fern-kelli-brown/
Source: Radio New Zealand
Dunedin’s southern motorway was closed at Burnside after a digger fell off a truck. NZTA / Waka Kotahi
The Southern Motorway at Burnside in Dunedin has reopened hours after it was blocked by a digger that fell off a truck.
Police were called to the crash on SH1 south of Morningside Road about 10.40am on Wednesday.
Tmotorway was blocked in both directions while the digger was uplifted, and it re-opened around 1.40pm.
Police said enquiries into the incident were still going and they called for anyone with any revelant information to get in touch.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/04/08/dunedin-motorway-reopens-after-being-blocked-by-digger/
Source: Radio New Zealand
AA’s petrol price spokesperson said there would need to be a more sustained move to end the conflict before prices came down for New Zealand motorists. RNZ / Mark Papalii
Oil prices have fallen sharply on news of a potential ceasefire and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz – but will drivers get any relief at the petrol pump?
Immediately after the announcement on Wednesday morning, the price of Brent crude oil fell about 16 percent to US$92.
Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said the price drop could be consistent with petrol prices falling about 20c per litre, to roughly $3.30 a litre 91.
“The number is obviously entirely contingent on things staying around where they are for at least the next few days… some of the risk premium in the oil markets has come out with this announcement so you would expect there to be a little bit of relief associated with that.”
But Infometrics chief forecaster Gareth Kiernan said he did not expect there to be any immediate relief for motorists.
“There’s still the month-long ‘air bubble’ in the oil supply that needs to work its way through the system before supply conditions can be considered to have returned towards normal. The Brent oil price that is quoted as having fallen is effectively the futures price for oil in June, but prices for oil physically delivered today have been much higher.
“Beyond the Brent oil price, I’d be keeping a close eye on how Dubai or other Middle East oil prices are tracking, because they had been considerably higher than the Brent price, as well as how refining margins or the crack spread across Asia are evolving. With respect to the latter, we had seen continuing increases in recent days that were likely to push diesel over $4/L in the short term – so there might actually still be more increases in the immediate future before we start to see retail diesel prices decline.”
He said at US$90 to US$95 a barrel, oil prices were still well above their pre-conflict levels.
“Even if there is eventually some flow-through of the ceasefire announcement into actual oil becoming more available, we’re still talking about petrol prices comfortably over $3/L at the moment. Of course, oil prices might moderate further once ships actually start transiting through the Strait of Hormuz again and markets become more confident about the veracity of the ceasefire – noting that it’s only a two-week ceasefire at this stage, but it’s going to be at least several weeks before the disruption to the supply chain that we’ve seen is rectified and fuel supplies might have returned to something approaching normal.”
Terry Collins, AA’s petrol price spokesperson said there would need to be a more sustained move to end the conflict before prices came down for New Zealand motorists.
There could still be insurance problems for boats travelling through the Strait of Hormuz, even if it was opened, he said.
Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/04/08/oil-prices-fall-will-petrol-follow/
Source: Radio New Zealand
John Campbell says he’s looking forward to his fourth stint at RNZ, as he prepares to join Ingrid Hipkiss on Morning Report next week.
Campbell, who describes RNZ as “the soundtrack of my childhood”, says he’s grateful for the two‑year cadetship he received at the broadcaster in 1989 – when he was making the switch from shouting out to ‘chalkies’ on the trading floor to reading the news bulletin, and eventually fronting Checkpoint for two years.
“And then suddenly you get an opportunity to front Morning Report. Of course you want to do it,” Campbell told Afternoons.
Morning Report presenters John Campbell and Ingrid Hipkiss.
RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/04/08/john-campbell-gears-up-for-rnz-return-i-just-believe-in-speaking-truth-to-power/
There is a bitter truth that must be spoken before we can talk honestly about what is happening to us now. Michael West Media reports on Australia’s quiet complicity in the illegal US-Israeli war on Iran.
COMMENTARY: By Andrew Brown
When the bombs fell on Gaza, Australia was quiet.
When the hospitals were destroyed, when the aid was blocked, when children were pulled from rubble in pieces, when the United Nations, the International Criminal Court, and humanitarian organisations with decades of credibility in conflict zones used words like genocide, ethnic cleansing and collective punishment, Australia was quiet.
Not uniformly. Not entirely. There were protests in every major city, sustained over months, of a size and seriousness this country has not seen since the Iraq War.
There were independent senators who stood in Parliament and said what needed to be said, in plain language, without diplomatic hedging. There were journalists, academics, former diplomats, and hundreds of thousands of ordinary Australians who signed petitions, marched in the streets, and wrote letters that went largely unanswered.
Palestinian-Australian, Muslim-Australian, Arab-Australian communities, and many others with no personal connection to the conflict beyond a functioning conscience, screamed into a political void and were told, in effect, to calm down.
Or apprehended for wearing a t-shirt.
“I’m offended by crocs,” says man apprehended by many police & special ops for wearing “F… Israel” t-shirt
The footage #andrewbrown #legend #auspol pic.twitter.com/fc1p3f911d
— 💧Michael West (@MichaelWestBiz) April 6, 2026
The country, as a political entity, its government, its major institutions, its official voice to the world, was quiet.
The cost of silence
That silence had a cost. Not just a moral cost, though the moral cost is staggering and will take generations to fully reckon with.
A strategic cost. The cost of allowing a logic of unchecked military impunity to establish itself as the operating principle of the US-Israeli alliance. A logic that, once normalised in Gaza, did not stay in Gaza.
It never does.
More than 72,000 people killed so far. More than 171,000 injured. An entire civilian population, in one of the most densely populated places on earth, was systematically starved, displaced, and destroyed.
Journalists were killed in numbers that constitute, by any honest accounting, a deliberate campaign to eliminate witnesses. Paramedics were bombed. UN peacekeepers were struck.
Aid workers from Australia’s own partner organisations were killed in strikes so precise they could not have been accidental.
Australia expressed concern.
Calibrated, diplomatically worded, operationally meaningless concern.
And then, when the same alliance, emboldened by 18 months of zero meaningful consequence, turned its weapons on a sovereign nation-state, on Iran, on February 28 of this year, Australia expressed support. Called it constructive. Offered the American justification back to its own people as sovereign Australian policy.
Warnings ignored
The people warning loudest about Gaza were not merely warning about Palestinians. They were warning about a system. A system in which American military power and Israeli strategic ambition, freed from the constraints of international law and serious allied pushback, would expand. Would find new targets. Would come, eventually, for the stability of every country caught in its orbit.
They were right. And they were called antisemitic for saying so.
Iran did not come from nowhere. The assault on Iran is the direct and logical extension of the impunity normalised in Gaza. If you can destroy a civilian population with no meaningful consequence, you can bomb a sovereign nation.
If the ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu means nothing, then international law means nothing. And if international law means nothing, then the only operating principle is force.
And the consequences of force are distributed not just to the combatants but to every country whose government chose alignment over principle.
Australia chose alignment over the people of Gaza. It chose it again over Iran. And now it is discovering, at the bowser and the checkout and the business bank account, exactly what that choice costs.
The war came home
Here is what makes this moment different from every protest march and every unanswered letter that came before.
The pain is no longer abstract.
When Gaza burned, the average Australian, cocooned by geographic distance, insulated by a media that kept the most confronting images off prime time, reassured by politicians who described it as heartbreaking while doing nothing, could maintain the fiction that this was someone else’s tragedy.
Terrible, certainly. Distant. Manageable. Something that happened over there, to people over there, in a conflict that had been going on forever and would presumably continue
without any particular bearing on the school fees or the mortgage or the quarterly business figures.
That fiction is now dead.
The fuel price spike is not over there. The supply chain disruption is not over there. The investment uncertainty showing up in superannuation statements, in business loans that just got harder to service, in the job that exists today and may not exist in three months.
None of that is over there.
The war came home. Not in body bags. Not in the specific grief of a military family. It came home in the way that imperial adventurism always eventually comes home to the countries that enable it.
Through the economy. Through the slow, grinding, distributed punishment of a population that was never consulted, never warned, and never honestly told what their government’s choices would cost them.
Australia’s complicity
Australia was a participant in Gaza’s destruction. Not with weapons. Not with soldiers. With silence. With diplomatic cover. With the specific, material legitimacy that flows from a liberal democracy declining to formally object. And with the arms adjacent, intelligence and security cooperation that flows through Five Eyes and has never been seriously interrogated in the Australian public domain.
Complicity is not passive.
When you have the power to intervene, to sanction, to condemn, to withdraw diplomatic cover, and you choose not to, you are not a bystander. You are a participant. And participants, eventually, share in the consequences.
The Palestinian people could not make Australia listen with their suffering alone.
Not because Australians are cruel. They are not. But because the suffering was made distant. The media made it complex. The politicians made it delicate. The lobby groups made it professionally dangerous to say in plain language what was plainly happening.
The whole architecture of managed consent did its job with brutal efficiency for 18 months.
But a 40 percent fuel price increase cuts through managed consent, as does a wave of small business closures. And young Australians told to absorb the economic consequences of a war their government endorsed without their knowledge or consent. That cuts through everything.
The people who protested over Gaza, who were dismissed and belittled and accused of antisemitism and told they were being naive about geopolitical complexity, understood something that the political class is only now beginning to grasp: That the world does not offer permanent non-involvement. That the wars you enable reach you. That the impunity you excuse comes back denominated in currencies you understand personally.
Fuel. Food. Jobs. Mortgages. Businesses. Futures.
This is that reckoning. The genocide in Gaza did not wake Australia up, the bill for enabling it will.
And when Australia wakes, fully, clearly, with the focused fury of people who now understand exactly what was done to them, the politicians who called it constructive and the media that told them to blame the Energy Minister are going to find that managed consent has a shelf life.
That shelf life has expired.
Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz
Evening Report: https://eveningreport.nz/2026/04/08/ignoring-genocide-the-bill-for-australias-silence-has-arrived/
Source: Green Party
The Green Party is calling on petrol companies to act quickly following the announcement of a two-week ceasefire that has caused the price of fuel to drop.
“Fuel companies moved quickly to increase their prices at the start of the conflict. With prices falling off the back of the ceasefire, they need to come down just as fast,” says Green Party Co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick.
“New Zealanders watch petrol prices jump up overnight when global oil prices spike, but when they fall, it always seems to take weeks for that to show up at the pump.”
“Isn’t it interesting that while regular people watch their cost of living rise, major corporations never seem to feel the pinch?”
“The Government can ensure New Zealanders are not paying inflated prices while fuel companies pocket the difference.”
“The Commerce Commission should keep closely monitoring fuel margins, and they need to be ready to use their powers under the Fuel Industry Act if we don’t see retail prices coming down.”
“If companies are not passing on lower costs in a timely way, it confirms the market is not working for New Zealanders, and the government needs to step in.”
“This is why the Green Party proposed a windfall profits tax as part of our fossil fuel crisis relief package.
“While immediate cost of living pressure like this is immediately necessary, we’re also crystal clear that the more we continue to be reliant on the conscience of fossil fuel corporations, the more our country remains vulnerable.”
“The only real, sustainable solution is clean, green, abundant, home-grown renewable energy powering our country and our economy,” says Swarbrick.
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/fossil-fuel-companies-on-notice-for-price-gouging/
8 April 2026, 2:30 pm – New Zealand’s response to the fossil fuel crisis must provide immediate relief to communities and local businesses, and enable a recovery that is equitable and sustainable, building our resilience for future shocks. Some practical measures to rebalance our tax system would make a significant contribution to such a response, says Tax Justice Aotearoa (TJA), and the Better Taxes for a Better Future Campaign (Better Taxes).
“Despite the potential of a ceasefire, there are tough times ahead for many of us already struggling with the cost of living. We need an effective immediate response that provides meaningful support to those worst affected, including small businesses, those on low incomes, Māori, Pacific and rural communities,” says TJA and Better Taxes spokesperson Glenn Barclay.
“But this crisis also provides us with an opportunity to make a meaningful shift towards a low carbon economy, and energy sovereignty. It is also an opportunity to rebuild a more resilient and productive economy that rewards hard work and shares our wealth more fairly.”
“The Government seems to want to respond within its self-imposed fiscal limits, but it is likely to have to do more. There is an urgent need to grow government revenue to fund both the immediate response and the longer-term recovery,” says Glenn Barclay. “This must be done in a way that protects the least well off, while ensuring that those who can afford it, and those who benefit from it, contribute the most.”
TJA and Better Taxes are calling for the Government to immediately adopt the following measures:
TJA and Better Taxes do not support any temporary reduction of the fuel excise. It would do nothing to reduce demand for fuel and the financial advantage would flow to big corporations, and the ultra-wealthy, as much as the least well off. The measures outlined above focus on delivering relief to those least able to weather the crisis, while supporting a transition to a more equitable, resilient and productive economy.
“A windfall tax on fossil fuel companies and transparency around their profit margins will discourage price gouging, and generate the revenue we need to provide immediate support to struggling whānau and local small and medium businesses,” says Glenn Barclay. “Other tax reform measures proposed will both generate much needed revenue, and enable us to take advantage of this moment to start to rebalance our tax system to support a more sustainable, fairer future for everyone in Aotearoa.”
Tax reform is the primary focus of TJA and Better Taxes, but increased borrowing is also a legitimate way to fund crisis response, particularly when accompanied by the recommended tax measures. Further, borrowing for immediate and medium term investment to build green energy sovereignty and resilience to future shocks is appropriate; a failure to make sufficient investments would be reckless.
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/fossil-fuel-crisis-response-opportunity-to-rebalance-tax-system-for-fairer-more-sustainable-future/
ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on April 8, 2026.
Are we ever truly free to make decisions? New study tracks a universal process in the brain
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lauren Claire Fong, PhD Candidate in Cognitive Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne Imagine you’re in line at your favourite bakery, deciding whether to have a doughnut or a tart. You weigh them up, the doughnut wins, and you settle on that. By the time you’re at the
Is sitting with your legs crossed actually bad for you?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joshua Pate, Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy, University of Technology Sydney Most of us were told off at some point for how we sat. “Don’t cross your legs, you’ll ruin your knees.” “You’ll get varicose veins.” “Sit properly.” “Sit up straight.” It belongs to that familiar pile of
‘Someone, everyone, stop them’ – and now Trump has pulled back from the brink
COMMENTARY: By Marilyn Garson, of Sh’ma Koleinu – Alternative Jewish Voices Vietnam survived Nixon’s madman theory and the world survived the era of mutually assured destruction. Now we face the moment of two super-empowered shitheads. There is nothing nicer to call them. Who will stop two self-obsessed, very old men, already dedicated to tearing down
Spotted a jellyfish bloom recently? Here’s what may have triggered it
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lisa-ann Gershwin, Research Scientist in Marine Biology, University of Tasmania On a calm summer morning in southern Australia, the water can look deceptively clear, until you see thousands of gelatinous shapes washing ashore. In January, thousands of pink lion’s mane jellyfish washed into Port Phillip Bay, prompting
What’s the place of humans in a world redefined by AI? Steve Toltz’s new novel has some ideas
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Seth Robinson, Lecturer, Professional Communications, Public Humanities & Creative Writing, The University of Melbourne The conditions for Russell “Rusty” Wilson’s life were set with the roll of a dice. After his parents announced their divorce, Rusty and his twin sister, Bonnie, were split up in a move
Polls suggest Trump still shielding Labor as right-wing vote drops
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne In my March 30 article about Newspoll and two other polls, I said Donald Trump’s unpopularity was shielding Labor from a backlash over the fuel crisis. The
The government has boxed itself in over fuel saving strategies – but there is a way out
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau While the government works to reassure New Zealanders that fuel stocks are stable, the numbers tell an uncomfortable story: the country has about 27 days of onshore cover for petrol and 17 days of
Earthrise to Earthset: how the planet’s climate has changed since the photo that inspired the environmental movement
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nick Dunstone, Climate Science Fellow, Met Office Hadley Centre A new Earthset image has been captured by the crew of Artemis II, 58 years since the iconic Earthrise photograph taken by the crew of Apollo 8. Over these past six decades, the climate has changed dramatically. “Oh
Swum into a jellyfish bloom recently? Here’s what may have triggered it
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lisa-ann Gershwin, Research Scientist in Marine Biology, University of Tasmania On a calm summer morning in southern Australia, the water can look deceptively clear, until you see thousands of gelatinous shapes washing ashore. In January, thousands of pink lion’s mane jellyfish washed into Port Phillip Bay, prompting
Keith Rankin Analysis – The Axis Nuclear Option in light of Japan 1945
Analysis by Keith Rankin, 8 April 2026. Based on my reading of the latest upscaling of US rhetoric, one of the military options being considered by the Israeli-American axis is the nuclear option. Refer Trump says a ‘whole civilization will die tonight’ if deal isn’t reached, One News, 8 April 2026. The possibility of Netanyahu
Should clinics prescribe medicinal cannabis that they also supply? We asked 5 experts
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Barbara Mintzes, Professor in Pharmaceutical Policy, School of Pharmacy and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney You can have an online consultation, be prescribed medicinal cannabis, and have it sent directly to your home, in a seamless operation. This one-stop-shop certainly sounds convenient. But not everyone’s happy.
6 things Australia should do to tackle the energy crisis rather than just building bigger fuel reserves
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Newman, Professor of Sustainability, Curtin University The three-page fuel plan the Australian government released last week was very light on detail. So too was Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s address to the nation. This week, Energy Minister Chris Bowen moved to reassure Australians their fuel supply was
Australia’s biggest stock exchange needs tougher competition, or we all risk paying the price
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Helen Bird, Industry Fellow, Corporate Governance & Senior Lecturer, Swinburne Law School, Swinburne University of Technology Almost every Australian has a stake in how well the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) works. Most working adults have superannuation savings invested in companies listed on the ASX, which together are
Ancient Romans were obsessed with a plant said to be contraception and aphrodisiac. Then one day, it went extinct
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Thomas J. Derrick, Gale Research Fellow in Ancient Glass and Material Culture, Macquarie University Roman leader Julius Caesar is said to have kept a stock of it in the treasury. Ancient writer Pliny the Elder says Rome’s Emperor Nero owned the last stalk of it. And some
Plagiarised research passed automated tests, and I detected it – but only because it copied my work
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Carolyn Heward, Senior lecturer, Clinical Psychology, James Cook University Earlier this year, I published a paper on the ethics of researching military populations. The core argument was straightforward: the standard rules researchers follow to protect participants – for example, informed consent and voluntary participation – don’t work
Slopaganda wars: how (and why) the US and Iran are flooding the zone with viral AI-generated noise
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Alfano, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Macquarie University In early March, a week after the first US-Israeli strikes on Iran, the White House posted a video of real American attacks mixed with clips from popular movies, television series, video games and anime. Iran and its sympathisers responded
Open letter to Peters: We fought fascism. Why are we silent now?
OPEN LETTER: By Nureddin Abdurahman to NZ Foreign Minister Winston Peters Minister, You are about to meet US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a time of real global tension. Moments like this define countries. My great-grandfather fought fascism. In 1935, when fascist Italy invaded my country of birth, Ethiopia, then Abyssinia, Emperor Haile Selassie
Ben Roberts-Smith is accused of 5 war crime murder charges. How did we get here?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paul Taucher, Lecturer in History, Murdoch University After landing in Sydney airport following a flight from Brisbane, Australia’s most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, was arrested by Australian Federal Police. He’s faced court in New South Wales and been charged with five counts of the war crime
This isn’t journalism – Australia’s Bowen beat-up and the Iran war
The Murdoch press runs cover for an illegal war by blaming the wrong man entirely, instead of informing the public of facts. Michael West Media reports. COMMENTARY: By Andrew Brown Here is a reliable indicator that you are being managed rather than informed. When the story gets complicated, when the real cause of your pain
It’s now easier to get antibiotics for UTIs. But here’s what to do if your symptoms don’t go away
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Iris Lim, Assistant Professor in Biomedical Science, Bond University You wake up with that familiar urgency to go to the toilet and burning when you pee – and no matter how many times you go, that urgency doesn’t let up. You know exactly what it is: a
Evening Report: https://eveningreport.nz/2026/04/08/er-report-a-roundup-of-significant-articles-on-eveningreport-nz-for-april-8-2026/
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lauren Claire Fong, PhD Candidate in Cognitive Neuroscience, The University of Melbourne
Imagine you’re in line at your favourite bakery, deciding whether to have a doughnut or a tart. You weigh them up, the doughnut wins, and you settle on that.
By the time you’re at the front of the line, however, only tarts are left. So, you buy one.
These two decisions feel completely different. One involves deliberation based on our unique and personal preferences, while the other involves simply recognising and picking the only available option.
But our latest research published in the journal Imaging Neuroscience shows our brains actually make these decisions in surprisingly similar ways.
When we make free decisions, we recognise multiple options exist, weigh them up, and commit to one based on something internal: our preferences, values and goals.
Forced decisions are different. There’s only one possible outcome, and our job is simply to identify the option and take it.
Because free decisions feel so closely tied to who we are, neuroscientists have long assumed they rely on different processes in the brain compared to forced decisions. Some brain imaging studies support this, showing different patterns of neural activity distributed across the brain.
However, knowing where in the brain free choices happen tells us little about how they are formed – and whether this process is any different from forced decisions.
Decades of research have shown that, to make decisions, our brains gradually gather evidence for each option over time.
Think of it like a judge evaluating the facts of a case. Once enough evidence has been accumulated in favour of one party, a verdict is reached. For some types of decisions, this happens very quickly (over hundreds of milliseconds), making it feel like the choice just popped into your head.
By measuring electrical brain activity, researchers have identified a brain signal that reflects this accumulation of evidence during simple decisions – such as judging whether a traffic light is red or green.
Like a loading bar building to 100%, the signal gradually rises to a particular level before a decision is made. Because the action of neurons in the brain is noisy, this decision-making process also occurs in a noisy fashion: rather than climbing steadily towards one option, the signal fluctuates back and forth between the alternatives.
This partly explains why we aren’t always consistent with our choices – even when our preferences are stable, some days we will go for the tart and others, the doughnut.
This signal has been identified for forced decisions with a clear correct answer. But what about choices that are open-ended – shaped not just by what’s in front of us, but by something internal like preferences or personal goals?
To answer this question, we recorded people’s brain activity while they chose between sets of coloured balloons. They viewed either two balloons of different colours to freely choose between, or a single balloon they were forced to pick.
They pressed a button the moment they made their choice, and we tracked how brain activity unfolded in the lead-up to that moment.
For both free and forced decisions, the brain activity unfolded in a very similar way. Like a loading bar, it climbed steadily to the same peak level just before a choice was made. When people decided quickly, the signal increased faster. When they took longer, it rose more slowly.
That’s exactly what you would expect if the brain were tracking and weighing up evidence over time, rather than simply reacting to a decision at the last moment.
From this finding, one might assume the brain forms free and forced decisions in the same way, suggesting decision-making in the brain may be more automatic than it feels.
This echoes famous experiments by neuroscientist Benjamin Libet in the 1980s. He and colleagues found brain activity begins ramping up before people are even consciously aware of their intention to act – suggesting the brain has already begun deciding before the person consciously realises they’ve made a choice.
But while the process may be automatic, what the brain is accumulating tells a different story. The evidence it weighs up is drawn entirely from who you are – your preferences, your goals, your experiences. Two people may go through the same neural process and land on the same choice, and yet arrive there for completely different reasons.
So rather than asking whether our choices are truly free, perhaps the better question is what it really means for a choice to be yours. And the next time you find yourself in line at the bakery, know that your brain has already been quietly gathering evidence toward your baked good of choice, and that choice happens a little faster than you realise.
– ref. Are we ever truly free to make decisions? New study tracks a universal process in the brain – https://theconversation.com/are-we-ever-truly-free-to-make-decisions-new-study-tracks-a-universal-process-in-the-brain-279747
Evening Report: https://eveningreport.nz/2026/04/08/are-we-ever-truly-free-to-make-decisions-new-study-tracks-a-universal-process-in-the-brain-279747/
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joshua Pate, Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy, University of Technology Sydney
Most of us were told off at some point for how we sat.
“Don’t cross your legs, you’ll ruin your knees.”
“You’ll get varicose veins.”
“Sit properly.”
“Sit up straight.”
It belongs to that familiar pile of health warnings many of us heard as kids, alongside cracking your knuckles or sitting too close to the television. But is crossing your legs actually bad for you?
For most people, the answer is probably no.
There is little evidence sitting with your legs crossed damages your back, wears out your hips or knees, or causes varicose veins.
If anything, the bigger issue for many of us is staying in one position for too long, getting stiff or sore, and then assuming discomfort must mean something is wrong with the body.
Part of it probably grew out of older ideas about posture.
For a long time, sitting “properly” was treated as a sign of discipline, self-control and good character. Once that kind of thinking takes hold, it is easy for social rules to start sounding like medical facts.
It is also easy (and common) to confuse discomfort with damage. Sitting cross-legged for a while can make you feel stiff, compressed, or ready to move.
But it is usually a cue to change position, not a sign that you are quietly harming your body.
That fits with modern thinking on posture and pain, which has moved away from the idea there is one “perfect” posture.
Crossing your legs is often lumped into the category of “bad posture”, as if it twists the spine into trouble.
But research on posture and back pain has not found one ideal sitting position that protects everyone, or one everyday sitting posture that reliably causes harm.
In one study, physiotherapists from different countries were asked to choose the “best sitting posture”. Their answers varied widely. The researchers concluded that beliefs about ideal sitting posture are shaped by tradition and professional culture as well as evidence.
Posture is still relevant, but your back is strong and adaptable. It is built to tolerate a wide range of positions.
Usually, the bigger problem is being stuck in any one posture for too long, whether that’s cross-legged, bolt upright, or slumped over a laptop.
Another common claim is that crossing your legs will “wear out” your hips or knees.
Again, there is little evidence that this is true.
Your hips and knees cope with much larger forces when you walk up stairs, rise from a chair, run, jump, or carry shopping.
Sitting cross-legged can change joint angles for a short time, but that is a long way from showing it causes arthritis or lasting joint damage.
Studies looking specifically at cross-legged sitting and long-term joint harm are limited, so the evidence is not perfect.
But the evidence we have does not support the old warning.
When clinical guidelines talk about keeping hips and knees healthy, they focus on things such as physical activity, muscle strength, healthy body weight, and managing overall joint load.
They do not focus on avoiding one ordinary sitting habit.
So if crossing your legs feels comfortable, there is little reason to treat it as dangerous.
If it starts to feel awkward or stiff, uncross them.
No.
Varicose veins happen when valves inside the veins do not work as well as they should, which can let blood pool and veins enlarge.
Risk is linked more strongly to factors such as age, family history, pregnancy, obesity and some work patterns, including long periods of standing.
Crossing your legs may briefly change blood flow while you are in that position. But that is not the same as causing varicose veins.
The evidence we have does not support crossed-leg sitting as a cause of varicose veins.
Sometimes, yes, but usually for specific clinical reasons and often only for a short time.
After some hip replacements, people have traditionally been told to avoid crossing their legs while tissues heal.
But even here, newer research suggests some of these precautions may be more cautious than necessary for many patients, and removing them did not increase early dislocation risk in one trial.
There are also situations where a clinician might suggest avoiding a position for comfort, or because it irritates a sensitive area for a while. That is very different from saying the position is broadly harmful for everyone.
And most of us know the temporary numbness or pins and needles that can come after sitting awkwardly for too long. That usually settles quickly once you move. Again, that is a prompt to change position, not proof of damage.
Movement variety matters more than posture perfection.
The body tends to do well with options. Sit cross-legged if that feels comfortable. Then uncross them. Shift your weight. Lean back. Stand up. Go for a walk.
The healthiest sitting position is often the one you do not hold for the next hour.
Move more, vary your position, and trust that your body is probably a lot less fragile than you were led to believe.
– ref. Is sitting with your legs crossed actually bad for you? – https://theconversation.com/is-sitting-with-your-legs-crossed-actually-bad-for-you-279090
Evening Report: https://eveningreport.nz/2026/04/08/is-sitting-with-your-legs-crossed-actually-bad-for-you-279090/
COMMENTARY: By Marilyn Garson, of Sh’ma Koleinu – Alternative Jewish Voices
Vietnam survived Nixon’s madman theory and the world survived the era of mutually assured destruction. Now we face the moment of two super-empowered shitheads. There is nothing nicer to call them.
Who will stop two self-obsessed, very old men, already dedicated to tearing down humanity? Today Trump openly declares his intention to destroy a civilisation. They are apparently only able to see war personally, Netanyahu as the climax of 40 years of dreaming, and Trump as his arbitrary prerogative.
In lockstep they destroyed Gaza’s homes, places of learning and culture, health and modernity. They murdered civilians with abandon and drew pictures of capitalist castles on the beach — and still they failed, just as their over-armed predecessors have failed from Vietnam to Afghanistan.
People still live, in great need of our action.
The scorched-earth vision of Trump and Netanyahu rolls onward. Now in Iran and again in Lebanon, they make war on civilian homes and infrastructure. They destroy families and livelihoods, places of beauty and culture, the bridges that connect us, the industries that rebuild and the energy that lights the darkness.
They desecrate all of our religions. The list of their crimes grows daily.
These two evil despots are content to erode the world’s supplies of power, fertiliser, manufacturing components. They are oblivious to the lives they imperil in Iran, Lebanon and Palestine — and countless other people who they will kill around the world by hunger and hardship.
Anything to rule, even over a landscape of bones and dust. They will fail but they must not be allowed to play this out.
We are beyond disgust. We are witnessing the end of an order indeed: America’s empire is flailing in its death throes. How many people will Trump take down with it?
Weighed down with dread, we have no words but these: someone, everyone, stop them!
Republished from Sh’ma Koleinu — Alternative Jewish Voices.
Trump may have backed down for now, but he’s shown how unhinged he is by threatening the death of a “whole civilization.”
I’m heading back to DC to try and get answers for the American people. Congress needs to return to the Capitol immediately and vote to end this war. https://t.co/vZLXb0anhq
— Senator Andy Kim (@SenatorAndyKim) April 8, 2026
Article by AsiaPacificReport.nz
Evening Report: https://eveningreport.nz/2026/04/08/someone-everyone-stop-them-and-now-trump-has-pulled-back-from-the-brink/
Source: New Zealand Police
Police are investigating two assaults believed to have occurred in Sydenham and are seeking information from the public as part of ongoing enquiries.
On Wednesday 18 March at around 10:15pm, Police were notified of a stabbing at Bradford Park.
The victim was transported to hospital for treatment and was released shortly after.
Enquiries to date indicate a second assault occurred earlier that evening on Colombo Street, just south of Fisher Avenue, at around 9:30pm.
Police believe the two incidents are linked.
Police are working to identify the victim of the Colombo Street incident and would like to speak with them, as they may have information that could assist our investigation.
Additionally, Police would like to hear from anyone who was in the Bradford Park or Colombo Street areas between 9:00pm and 10:15pm on Wednesday 18 March.
This includes anyone who may have witnessed suspicious activity or who has relevant CCTV or dashcam footage.
Anyone with information is urged to contact Police via 105, either by phone or online at police.govt.nz/use-105, selecting “Update Report.”
Please reference file number 260319/6021.
Information can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.
ENDS
Issued by Police Media Centre
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/christchurch-police-appeal-for-information-following-two-assaults/
Midlife women focus more on alcohol’s immediate health impacts than longer-term risks, a new study shows.
Women manage the immediate health impacts of alcohol, but pay less attention to long-term risks such as cancer, according to new research out of Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland.
Dr Kate Kersey, a research fellow in the Centre for Addiction Research, interviewed 50 New Zealand women aged 35 to 60, both individually and in friendship groups, to explore how they understand and manage their drinking. See Psychology and Health: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2026.2650785
Overall, 29 women (58 percent) drank at least twice a week, and 25 women (50 percent) typically drank three or more drinks on each occasion.
“There was a strong sense of expert knowledge in how participants talked about what alcohol does to the body,” says Kersey. “They spoke frequently about its negative effects on sleep quality, energy levels and weight.
“Interestingly, they did not talk much about long-term health effects such as heart disease or cancer. However, consistent with our other research, some participants said that if they were to develop cancer, they would feel deeply guilty, worrying that alcohol might have contributed.”
Kersey says these understandings reflect our current social context, where people are expected to take individual responsibility for successful lives and good health.
“If you are expected to be a ‘good’, productive citizen – you need to have the energy to perform well at work and stay fit and healthy.
The study also analysed women’s answers through a gendered lens. Today’s ‘empowered’ midlife women are expected to put effort into being a good mother and career women, into looking after themselves and others, and into ‘looking good’.
This was evident in how women in this study often framed drinking-related harms as something that could be managed through knowledge, careful monitoring and self-discipline – for example by tracking consumption through apps, investing in their health, and maintaining a slim body.
“They described doing a lot of exercise, with a strong sense that this was compensating for the effects of alcohol. However, we know that exercise does not always counteract alcohol’s harms, particularly its carcinogenic properties,” Kersey says.
The research focused primarily on middle-class Pākehā women, and Kersey notes that further work is needed with different communities and demographics.
Within this sample, however, most participants believed that they were ‘responsible’ about their drinking – a term Kersey sees as highly flexible and individualised.
“Everybody has a different idea of what being ‘responsible’ means when it comes to drinking,” she says. “For some people, that can still involve drinking quite large amounts – half a bottle of wine a night, or even a bottle.
“And if they are still doing their lives ‘right’ – working, parenting, exercising – they are less worried about their consumption.”
Kersey describes this as drinking within an ‘alcohol-genic environment’, where responsibility is placed on individuals to manage their drinking while alcohol remains widely available and heavily promoted.
“The industry pushes the framing of ‘drinking responsibly’, as does the government, because alcohol is a prized economic activity in our society.”
She argues that policy changes are needed like those that successfully reduced smoking-related harm: higher pricing, reduced availability, and strong regulation of marketing.
Kersey also emphasises the need for gender-responsive alcohol policy.
“One of the worst developments was alcohol being sold in supermarkets where the majority of shoppers are women, and where it’s seen like any other grocery item,” she says. “But alcohol is not a food product – it’s a psychoactive substance that can cause significant harm.”
Alcohol companies also increasingly target women through marketing that links drinking with health and self-care (relaxation, pleasure, social connection). Drinks labelled as low-sugar or low-carb also target women’s desire to maintain slim bodies.
Overall, the study shows that women’s drinking practices do not exist in a neutral environment.
“They are socially shaped, deeply gendered, and strongly influenced by powerful commercial interests,” Kersey says.
“If we want to reduce alcohol-related harm, we need to move beyond individual responsibility and address the wider systems that normalise New Zealand’s drinking culture.”
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/university-research-study-reveals-how-women-weigh-health-impacts-of-drinking-uoa/
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder is common, yet there is little support for carers, something a researcher at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland hopes to improve.
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is common in Aotearoa New Zealand, yet there is little support for individuals and whānau affected by it – something Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland is keen to change.
Dr Joanna Ting Wai Chu, a senior research fellow in social and community health, has received $1.4 million over three years to run a gold‑standard trial of a parenting intervention aimed at supporting caregivers and people with FASD.
“I am thrilled to receive the HRC Health Delivery funding for this trial because I feel a sense of social responsibility to carers who have been advocating for better support for many years now.”
The Ministry of Health estimates that three to five percent of the population may have been exposed to alcohol before birth, meaning it is likely that 1,800 to 3,000 babies are born each year with FASD.
For Chu, finding out more about the scale of the problem and what can help feels like a social responsibility. “We have such a huge alcohol‑drinking culture in New Zealand, but when you come into the space of foetal alcohol spectrum disorder, the amount of blame and the stigma attached is actually quite upsetting.”
According to data from the University of Auckland’s Growing Up in New Zealand study, around half of pregnancies are unplanned, Chu says.
“If you look at our drinking culture, and the fact we often don’t find out we’re pregnant until we’re six or seven weeks or, even 12 weeks for some, by then you probably have drunk some alcohol.”
Yet, even though it is easy to accidentally drink during pregnancy, there is still shame and stigma associated with FASD, Chu says.
FASD is a lifelong disability that affects brain function and development, creating significant challenges for individuals, their families and society.
International research estimates that ten to 36 percent of people in youth-justice facilities have FASD.
Chu plans to co‑design a randomised controlled trial of a parenting intervention currently available only on an ad hoc basis, usually when a community organisation can fund it.
Chu developed the funding application with the FASD Care Action Network (FASD‑CAN), a nonprofit that supports caregivers impacted by FASD. They will now work together to design the trial to ensure it is bicultural, measures the most important outcomes and is delivered safely and respectfully.
“We want to make sure that the programme is going to work for the community, rather than us as researchers deciding everything. One of the issues with parenting programmes is they often works in the controlled setting, but when you roll them out into the community, the impact or the uptake is often not very high.
“And that’s because often what we can control for in research doesn’t necessarily mean it applies in the community.”
The aim is to ensure the programme meets community needs and, in the long run, for it to be funded by government as a key parenting programme to support carers.
“There is currently very little support available for parents and carers,” Chu says.
The hope is that parents and carers will learn about FASD, how it differs from other spectrum disorders and strategies to respond appropriately.
With better diagnosis and targeted support, Chu hopes carers will feel better equipped to support those living with this common disabling condition.
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/university-research-hope-research-will-improve-support-for-fasd-uoa/
Source: New Zealand Police
Dunedin Southern Motorway, Burnside, has reopened following an incident this morning and Police are now asking the public for information.
At around 10.40am, Police responded to reports that a digger had partially come off the back of a truck and was blocking multiple lanes.
Dunedin Southern Motorway was closed in both directions, between the Main South Road on-ramp and Caversham Valley Road, while the digger was uplifted, and it re-opened around 1.40pm.
Enquiries into the circumstances of the incident are ongoing, and Police are appealing for information from the public to assist in those enquiries.
Anyone who has dashcam footage or witnessed the incident is urged to contact Police through 105 and reference event number P066019039.
ENDS
Issued by Police Media Centre
LiveNews: https://livenews.co.nz/2026/04/08/appeal-for-information-after-road-opens-dunedin-southern-motorway-burnside/
Source: Radio New Zealand
RNZ / Quin Tauetau
Two men are due in court on Wednesday after separate attempts to steal fuel as police say they are seeing an increase in diesel thefts.
Officers were called about 4am today to a Christchurch address after a person reported seeing someone trying to siphon petrol from their vehicle in Sockburn.
“Officers have immediately attended and made enquiries in the area, before stopping a vehicle,” police said.
“A search of the vehicle saw it contained five 60 litre containers, a battery-operated siphoning pump, and a small amount of methamphetamine.”
A 31-year-old man was due to appear in the Christchurch District Court today on charges of unlawfully interfering with a motor vehicle, possessing goods capable of facilitating dishonesty offending, and possession of methamphetamine.
Meanwhile, in Hamilton, police were called about 4.20am by a person watching a man steal diesel from their worksite in Peacocke via a live camera.
The man drove off in a hatchback south of the city and was intercepted by police and arrested.
“Located in his vehicle were three containers of diesel, as well as several tools, drugs, and knives,” police said.
The 35-year-old man was expected to appear in the Hamilton District Court today.
Assistant Commissioner Tusha Penny said police were continuing to monitor fuel thefts and had started to see a rise in diesel thefts.
“These incidents are an example of where we are reliant on sharp-eyed members of the public to call police immediately when they see any suspicious activity,” she said.
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/04/08/two-arrested-over-diesel-thefts-as-police-note-growing-trend/