Source: Radio New Zealand
A selection of firearms which are now prohibited, on display to media at a 2022 police press conference. RNZ / Ana Tovey
Firearms owners say the government’s overhaul of gun laws doesn’t go far enough to undo the “damage that was done” after the 15 March terror attacks.
A Muslim leader, meanwhile, told MPs to consider public safety over what was convenient for firearms owners.
Parliament’s Justice Committee has been hearing in-person submissions on the country’s new gun regulations, put forward in the Arms Bill.
Many licensed firearms owners expressed concerns the changes don’t go far enough, while the Police Association has criticised the new regulator being set up without sworn officers.
Support ‘with reservations’ from firearms groups
On Monday morning, MPs heard from firearms groups, gun control advocates, and the union representing police.
Much of the submissions from firearms groups focused on their problems with the existing legislation, and whether they thought the new bill would assuage them.
The New Zealand Deerstalkers Association supported the bill, with “some reservations,” feeling it did not go far enough.
“It fails to meaningfully unwind many of the bad policy decisions, the over regulation and the structural failures introduced since 2019, said chief executive Gwyn Thurlow.
“Farmers, land owners, and conservation agencies are calling for more effective game animal control and pest eradication and biodiversity outcomes but successive governments had stigmatised the use of firearms. This has not been resolved by this bill.”
Thurlow felt political fear and media pressure had “constrained” the bill.
“When lawful, fit and proper people exit the system because it has become too difficult, too intrusive, too hostile to engage with, public safety is not improved.”
Zac Dodunski, from the Taranaki branch of the New Zealand Antique and Historical Arms Association said the new legislation was the “first steps” in the right direction, considering the “damage that was done” post-Christchurch.
Fish and Game New Zealand supported the bill, but suggested “practical gaps” could be filled, such as making agency-owned firearms registered to the agency, not the individual employee.
The bill would also keep the firearms registry implemented after the 15 March attacks.
Despite supporting the intent of the bill, the Council of Licensed Firearms Owners (COLFO) said there remained a level of mistrust from firearms owners that information would be kept safe.
“The continued perception that the registry will magically solve gun crime, despite worldwide evidence to the contrary, will continue to be a bureaucratic burden around the New Zealand taxpayer’s neck,” said COLFO’s chair Brad Gallop.
New regulator questioned
The new regulator, without sworn police officers, was also met with concern.
The Police Association’s president Steve Watt said it was appropriate that the governance of the regulator and the enforcer were the same.
“Police being part of the FSA is an extremely important issue for us, as it does provide safety and security for our members, in the sense that there is coherent information sharing, and there is a robust system in place whereby we can share that information and make sure that safety and security is at the forefront,” he said.
“When we consider all the things that can be simplified, firearms isn’t one of them.”
Philippa Yasbek, co-founder of Gun Control NZ, said the bill’s “hostility” towards police involvement in the regulator was risky.
Yasbek said the bill was “not terrible, but it is messy” and anticipated Parliament would have to fix the legislation “many, many times” if the bill was passed in its current state.
But COLFO supported the change, with Gallop calling for a separate legal entity to ensure distinct separation of powers.
He had concerns that the FSA would still be part of police from a budgetary perspective, meaning police could still have influence on the FSA.
“There are still some issues around the bureaucracy that has been created by the FSA that have overly complicated licensed firearms owners to both renew their license and also transact on a day to day basis with the FSA,” he said.
“The issue we have is not with licensed firearms owners’ ability to register their firearms. The issue is the mistrust within the firearms community of the ability of the police at the moment to keep that information safe.”
The process of appointing a chief executive to the FSA was “significant,” Yasbek said, as she felt it was an “unconstitutionally precedented arrangement.”
She called for a merit-based appointment, with the process led by the Public Service Commission, instead of one appointed by the Governor-General.
“The risk cuts both ways, it could be that someone’s appointed who I think is far too close to the gun lobby. Alternatively, governments change, and suddenly it’s someone who’s seen as completely hostile to gun owners.”
Abdur Razzaq from the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand also opposed the method of appointing a chief executive.
“There needs to be a merit-based approach, and when that merit-based approach is bypassed by political appointees, under whatever guise, I don’t think we could accept that.”
Razzaq said the convenience of lawful firearms owners should never come above public safety, and called on the committee to keep the “tangible grief, the lasting grief, the memory, and the legacy” of the 51 people who died in the terror attacks in mind as it considered the bill.
“The bill is not only about making the whole licensing system more efficient, it is not only about making the system more convenient for lawful users, and there are many Muslim licensed gun users. It should also be about, does it make New Zealand safer? We request this last metric be the central argument in your deliberations. That should be the litmus test.”
He told the MPs on the committee the future of the nation’s safety and wellbeing was in their hands.
“You will be accountable,” he said.
What does the bill do?
The bill as introduced would repeal and replace the 1983 Act, introducing new penalties and tougher restrictions for gang members.
Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee had sought a carve out for competitive shooters to access military-style semi-automatic firearms, but failed.
It would also reform the Firearms Safety Authority without sworn police officers, and headed up by its own chief executive, who would report to the firearms minister, instead of the police minister.
At its first reading in December, Labour supported the bill, while the Greens and Te Pāti Māori opposed it.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/03/02/firearms-owners-say-gun-laws-overhaul-doesnt-go-far-enough-to-undo-damage/