Category: LiveNews

Source: Radio New Zealand

Close to 50 homes in an Auckland suburb are being compulsorily bought to make way for new flood plains and uncover a buried stream.

This is in Rānui, where some homeowners are relieved to get out, while others wish they could stay.

It’s just the start of Auckland Council’s plan to reduce the risk in flood-prone areas of the region and it says there are more property acquisitions ahead.

Emily Stewart, her husband and two children moved out of their house in Rānui’s Clover Drive a few weeks ago.

It’s been bought under the Public Works Act because a piped stream is being uncovered.

“The stream is going to come through approximately through here…right through our house.”

On Sunday, the home was relocated to Waikato.

Stewart said they planned to sell the house three years ago before the storms hit – some of her neighbours had to kayak from their houses.

The Stewarts weren’t eligible for a risky-home buyout, so had repairs done, then learned their house would be acquired to daylight a stream and create a flood plain.

The family has bought and moved to another part of the city.

“It’s bittersweet because for three years we were just stuck in this limbo. Back in October all of the houses in this cresent were still standing in various states of decay,” Stewart said.

‘We need this land’ – council

Auckland Council’s head of sustainable partnerships Tom Mansell said of the almost 50 homes required for flood plains in Rānui, half were state owned.

“Some of these properties, most of them have been flooded, some of them have been partially flooded, some of them haven’t been flooded but we need this land to save other surrounding properties from flooding.”

He said it would save 100 properties and also enable future development.

The Rānui Making Space for Water project is costing $85 million, of which most – close to $50m – is for buying properties.

“It’s digging up the pipe, creating the flood plain, creating the stream, upgrading Don Buck Road bridge,” Mansell said.

“It’s transforming communities, it is disruptive, it is costly but moving forward with climate change and increased rainfall it is a new era in managing stormwater.”

Mansell said negotiating with homeowners was a sensitive process.

“Some homeowners are relieved it is a way out, a fresh start for them and some not so much, it’s really quite hard hitting. Some of them have been there 30 to 40 years and it’s their home, there’s a reluctance to leave.”

He said there will be more homes acquired to make way for flood plains in coming years as the council confirms other projects.

“Overall, it creates more greenspace, creates resilient communities and it’s the way of the future for managing stormwater.”

Reluctant to leave

Another Clover Drive homeowner, Wayne Macdonald, didn’t want to leave but accepted a Public Works Act buyout.

“I was hoping to stay,” he said.

“I was disappointed, I like my house. I like its location, I like how it’s close to everything and I didn’t really look forward to looking for a new house and I’m struggling to find something.”

He was aware the acquisition was compulsory and said the financial incentives for accepting a buyout within certain timeframes made it more attractive.

Macdonald said the plans to create a bigger stream and flood plain included walking paths and reserve areas.

“What they’re doing is actually really nice and for a lot of neighbourhoods around, it’s going to give them options. They’re going to be able to walk away from the streets and pollution of the cars, kids are going to have areas to go play.”

Further along the road, Donna Mather’s home is not in a flood zone.

There are already many vacant plots from houses that were too risky to live in and she said having more homes go with compulsory acquisitions will change the neighbourhood.

“A lady friend up on Universal Drive, she will be moving because she was bought out. Apparently her place is going to be a pond.”

Under the Public Works Act, councils or agencies buying properties can only inform property owners – not tenants.

Stewart said this created problems on her street, because some neighbours were only recently informed by their landlords who have to give 90 days notice to end a tenancy.

“They were completely rug-pulled, like what’s going on, what’s happening I’m getting conflicting information.”

She said that needed to change.

“What I’m seeing is that we are prioritising homeowners over people who are renting and that’s not how this society should be supporting each other,” Stewart said.

“The fact that I’ve been told that they are having to look at work-arounds means there’s something wrong with the law. There is an oversight with the laws that they are bound by,” she said.

“The way we can make change for the better for people is to say ‘this isn’t working’.”

Mansell said the council strongly encouraged landlords to inform tenants if their house was being bought out – and tenants have access to financial support during the process.

“We encourage them strongly to talk to their tenants and we have a community advisory group which meets every two weeks…so we try and keep as much information about what we’re doing, the overall layout of the project is out in the community,” Mansell said.

“That’s one way the information gets out but unfortunately we cannot contact the tenants directly, we have to go through the landlord.”

The compulsory buyouts come as the region is under pressure to intensify housing and build more homes and the council was preparing plans to accommodate up to 2 million homes in coming decades.

However last month, Cabinet agreed to lower the maximum number of houses in Auckland from 2 million to at least 1.6 million.

Mansell said houses needed to be built in safe areas.

“The last thing we want to do is more development with houses in the wrong place in a danger zone so we are watching and working with this plan change. We don’t want to create more issues moving forward.”

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/03/04/dozens-of-auckland-homes-compulsorily-bought-by-council-for-flood-relief-plan/

Source: Radio New Zealand

The Education Ministry has been underestimating the scale of the secondary teacher shortage, and says correcting its calculations caused this year’s jump in the forecast shortage.

The ministry last week forecast a likely shortfall of 1220 secondary teachers this year and next, up from last year’s projection of 880 for the same period.

The ministry’s education workforce head Anna Welanyk told RNZ the change was because the ministry previously assumed schools hired in outside teachers to cover about half of the time when their regular teachers were out of their classrooms due to factors such as non-contact time.

Welanyk said research last year showed that was true for primary schools, but not for secondary schools which used relief teachers for almost all of their teachers’ non-contact hours.

“We went out and talked to the sector to find out more information about exactly whether or not those assumptions were valid and determined that for primary, they were bang on and for secondary, they really weren’t,” she said.

She said that meant secondary schools needed more teachers in the system than previously thought.

“Because we changed the assumption to reflect what we understand to be something closer to the real life scenario, it’s meant that we’ve had to add on an additional 580-odd additional teachers into the secondary space.

“It’s not that the situation’s got dramatically worse or that our forecasting was not where it needed to be. It’s more that more detail in terms of the research that we’ve done has pointed us in a slightly different direction.”

She confirmed that it also meant the ministry had under-estimated demand for secondary teachers in previous forecasts.

Welanyk said without the change the ministry would have forecast a shortage of 140 rather than 710 secondary teachers this year.

“The situation, as described by the data in the report, is a more accurate reflection of the pressure on the system.”

In 2023, the ministry under-estimated demand for primary teachers after failing to account for changes to their collective agreement.

Meanwhile, Welanyk said there were early signs that enrolments in initial teacher education programmes had increased 30 percent his year.

“It’s very promising. It’s the highest increase that we’ve seen in quite a while, since before covid. So what that tells us is that people are interested in teaching as a profession. They do see it as a viable career path,” she said.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/03/04/ministry-underestimated-scale-of-secondary-teacher-shortage/

Source: Radio New Zealand

A proposed gold mine is on the fast-track list. Proponents says it will bring jobs and money to the region, but opponents say it will be an economic ‘short-term sugar hit … with long-term consequences’.

Plans for a large, open cast gold mine in Central Otago are pitting locals against each other, while a mining industry executive says New Zealanders are too negative and catastrophise projects they don’t understand.

Australian company Santana Minerals has applied for fast-track approval to build an open cast mine in the Dunstan mountain range, an hour’s drive east of Queenstown, after discovering what it calls the largest single gold deposit in New Zealand in more than four decades.

According to the documents submitted to the fast-track panel, Santana will build four open mine pits. The largest, Rise and Shine Open Pit will be one kilometre long, 800 metres wide and 200 metres deep. There will also be three shallower pits, a processing plant that is one kilometre long and 120 metres wide, and a tailing storage facility to store mineral waste dust.

It says the project will employ hundreds of people and be worth $6 billion in revenue and more than $1b in taxes and royalties for New Zealand.

The fast-track panel is set to decide by late October and, if approved, it will be the first new mine to get the go-ahead under the accelerated process.

Opponents fear it will destroy threatened plants, scar the unique landscape and pollute the land and water. They say New Zealand will not get all the economic benefits because Santana is an Australian company, and they warn it will open the door to more mining in the region.

Two main groups are campaigning against the mine with backing from famous residents including actor Sir Sam Neill and painter Sir Grahame Sydney, as well as the former prime minister Helen Clark.

One of the groups, Sustainable Tarras, has already been fighting plans to build an international airport near the town. It calls the Santana proposal ‘David versus Goliath’ and is asking for donations to fund experts to fully understand the economic, environmental and social impacts of the mine.

“We are fighting this hard,” it says on its website.

Artist Gregory O’Brien, who organised a fundraising exhibition for the group, says the “proposed desecration of a heritage area for purely monetary gain is an outrage to all of us, as it is to the citizens of Central Otago and to all New Zealanders”.

“Painters, photographers, writers, film-makers, choreographers and other arts practitioners from within Central Otago and further afield are incensed at the churlishness of both the mining consortium and the Government’s ruinous ‘fast-track’ (aka ‘Highway to Hell’) legislation.

“The environmental cost of such a cold-blooded, extractive exercise is simply too high, as is the social impact and down-stream legacy.”

On the other side, Santana Mine Supporters, a Facebook group with 6,800 members says Central Otago “deserves opportunity – higher-paid local jobs, stronger regional businesses, and meaningful investment back into our community. We also believe development must be done properly, with high standards, transparency, and long-term accountability.”

RNZ Central Otago reporter Katie Todd has spoken to many locals, including farmers who see it as a positive move for the region and a continuation of the area’s mining legacy.

She says the application has been drawn out.

“Santana Minerals were asking for it to be considered within 30 days or so and we’ve recently learnt it’s going to be more like 140 days.

“In part that’s because of iwi opposition. Kā Rūnaka, which is a collective of Otago hapū, has raised concerns about potential Treaty settlement breaches and their concerns were described by the panel convenor of the fast-track application as significant and immutable.

“So that’s going to be something to watch,” says Todd.

Matthew Sole of Central Otago Environmental Society says communities are divided over the mine.

“There’s a lot of tension in the community,” he says. “There are certainly a lot of people for it.

“It’s the comments you receive on social media when you try and put up a counter argument and the difficulty I find with it is it’s actually hard to have a conversation.”

Sole says many people are under financial pressure and are concerned about the country’s future.

“I take a wider, longer term view that we’ve got to move on from exploitation to economies that have a right relationship with our environment. I think we’ve got to change away from these extractive processes to more enduring relationships and regenerative relationships with the land.”

Sole has produced a YouTube video of the area that will be mined and points out unique, threatened plants and remnants of past mining endeavours that are part of its precious heritage that he says are at risk. He says the old mining era cannot be compared to today’s.

“We’re talking about two different things. The early mining was largely mining of individual endeavour and it was largely with human hands with the use of water,” he says.

The impact of modern mining is “devastating, it has lost its context and meaning because of the vast industrial scale by massive machinery. We’re not comparing like with like”.

In a story for Newsroom last week, Jill Herron wrote that nearly a million hectares across Otago, and another 100,000 in Southland, are now at various stages of being “pegged” by gold mining companies.

But chief executive of New Zealand Minerals Council, Josie Vidal, says people have no need to panic and “possibly none” of the areas that have been identified on a minerals map drawn up by Earth Sciences New Zealand will be mined.

Heightened interest in the area is driven by the record price of gold, she says. She believes many will be hobby gold miners and doubts there would be any other large mines like Santana that are at a serious stage.

“There’s a lot of interest in gold of the traditional gold mining areas of which Otago is one, and there’s quite a lot of interest from smaller prospectors who could do quite well out of getting a fairly small amount of gold because the price is so high.”

She calls the Santana proposal “a bog standard gold mine”.

“I’m mystified by the attention. It’s a gold mine like any other. There’s no reason for it not to proceed.”

When The Detail asked Santana for an interview, it replied in an email with a number of conditions.

On balance and representation it said, “Please confirm who else will be featured or interviewed, and whether local voices and businesses many of which support the project – not just high-profile critics – are being included to reflect the full spectrum of community sentiment”.

It later declined our interview request but referred us it its 9,400-page application.

In an email, it said it welcomes scrutiny.

“What we cannot support is the amplification of assertions that have already been addressed, in writing, in data, numerous interviews and expert reports – simply because they are emotive or convenient to repeat and you haven’t bothered to fact check their claims.

“If the program’s objective is balance and informed debate, then the technical evidence must sit alongside the sentiment.”

Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/03/04/a-gold-mine-an-australia-mining-giant-and-a-community-divided/

Source: Radio New Zealand

MediMap’s failings will likely be covered by the review into Manage My Health, despite the recent data breach not being included by name.

The prescription portal was now being brought back online, having been down since 22 February, after it was discovered patient information had been changed.

MediMap said it had “rebuilt a secure production environment, completed a forensic review and validation of our data, identified the specific demographic records that were altered, and strengthened authentication controls, supported by independent cyber security specialists”.

All user passwords would be reset and any medication changes made manually during the outage would require clinical review, it said.

It acknowledged the “patience and professionalism” of healthcare staff dealing with manual processes, and apologised to residents, patients, families and healthcare providers for any disruption and distress.

A court injunction had been granted which prohibited anyone from accessing, using, copying, sharing or publishing any of the data.

The MediMap breach followed a hack of the patient portal ManageMyHealth (MMH) in late December, which sparked a review, commissioned by Health Minister Simeon Brown, to be carried out by the Ministry of Health.

The minister’s office said while MediMap would not be explicitly included by name in the review currently underway, the systemic issues which led to it would likely apply to both.

“The Ministry of Health’s review into the Manage My Health (MMH) cyber security incident is considering the broader issue of how private companies secure health data,” a spokesperson said.

A Ministry of Health spokesperson said the aim of the review was to understand the causes of the MMH breach, and the response, and to recommend improvements to ensure data breaches were better prevented in the future.

“While our focus remains on Manage My Health, the learnings will apply more broadly to other digital platforms which manage heath data.”

MediMap has been approached for comment.

On Thursday last week, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Cabinet had just signed off on a new cyber security policy and strategy.

“It’s entirely appropriate that we look at our whole settings, because we need to make sure we’ve got tougher cyber securities around our critical infrastructure.”

He also sent a strong message to businesses.

“The Kiwi laid-backness in a cyber security world where there are real risks and challenges is not good enough. You need to be investing, and making sure that your systems and your protocols are up to speed, and are actually on-point, and that they continually evolve.”

He said the government would be consulting on the problem over the next few months, and considering incentives and punishments.

Last week, Manage My Health began notifying a further group of patients affected by the December attack.

It did not respond to questions about why these people had not been notified earlier.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

LiveNews: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/03/04/medimap-failings-likely-to-be-canvassed-as-part-of-manage-my-health-review/